So, it's obvious that Five Ten is trying to co-opt the Occupy movement, which is just wrong. But Five Ten's products have nothing to do with upending the inequality that Occupy is confronting.
Now, if Five Ten were its own company, the ad might be nothing more than a bit of cheek. But now that they're part of the sportswear behemoth that is Adidas (€11.99 in revenue in 2010), the ad is the epitome of hypocrisy: a company that's part and parcel of neoliberal capitalism trying to sell product by invoking the very forces that would see it fall. Ouch.
To open a whole 'nother can of worms, the other problem with the ad is that Yosemite is already
Occupied by a bunch of citizens of the U.S., the government of which invaded and forcibly
removed the indigenous people who previously inhabited it. Many
factions of the movement have problematized the word "Occupy," noting, for instance, that European settlers forcibly installed
themselves on the land that's now Wall Street — the “Wall”
refers to the barrier they erected to keep natives out. How
would this ad come off if it read “Occupy Ship Rock” or “Occupy
Devil's Tower,” two places where climbing access has disrupted
indigenous rights? Of course most of our country is occupied
in this sense, but the barb of irony is particularly sharp in the National Parks.
=====
Well, what're you gonna do? At the end of the day, this particular ad doesn't make a difference. It's just an indicator of the relationship between climbing, media, and advertisement. But that doesn't mean climbing itself has lost its spirit or any other such doomsday-speak. You're just better off looking for that spirit at an actual crag rather than in a magazine.